Client Alerts & Newsletters

Employee’s Schmoozing Leads to Company Liability Under Anti-Kickback Act


In United States ex rel. Vavra v. Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc. (Feb. 3, 2017), the Fifth Circuit held that under the Anti-Kickback Act, corporations are liable "only for the knowing violations of those employees whose authority, responsibility, or managerial role within the corporation is such that their knowledge is imputable to the corporation." In applying this standard to the two KBR employees, the court found that one employee’s knowledge could be imputed to the corporation because of his "somewhat significant managerial authority over the sphere of activities in question," while the other employee’s responsibility with the subcontract was too limited to impute knowledge. Additionally, the court noted that while currying favor generally would be insufficient to constitute a kickback under the Act, here the supplier intended to receive favorable treatment and thus the meals and entertainment (totaling less than $4,700), were sufficiently connected "with the specific kind of treatment sought in a way that establishes impropriety" to constitute kickbacks. Visit our blog for additional details about this decision.

For more information, please contact the professional(s) listed below, or your regular Crowell & Moring contact.

Alan W. H. Gourley
Partner – Washington, D.C.
Phone: +1 202.624.2561

Crowell & Moring LLP is an international law firm with more than 500 lawyers representing clients in litigation and arbitration, regulatory, and transactional matters. The firm is internationally recognized for its representation of Fortune 500 companies in high-stakes litigation, as well as its ongoing commitment to pro bono service and diversity. The firm has offices in Washington, DC, New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Orange County, London, Brussels, and Shanghai.

View Desktop Site | Mobile Sitemap

Contact | Subscribe | Terms of Use | Privacy Statement | Alumni

© Crowell & Moring LLP 2020
Attorney advertising - prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.