Professionals >

Representative Engagements >

The International Trade Commission (ITC) is an extremely effective forum for the resolution of intellectual property disputes involving the importation of allegedly infringing goods. Relief at the ITC is as swift as it is severe. Section 337 investigations typically conclude within 16 months and can result in the exclusion of any products found to be infringing from entry into the United States by U.S. Customs, and the prevention of future sales of previously imported infringing goods.

Section 337 litigation presents a number of unique challenges stemming from the intersection of two complex and highly focused areas of law: intellectual property and international trade. Our firm's unique combination of IP and international trade experience, coupled with our extensive litigation capabilities, means that we have the resources needed to successfully represent clients in all aspects of a Section 337 investigation:

  • Deep IP bench needed for complex technology involved in Section 337 investigations
  • Proficiency in U.S. customs law and post-remedy administrative procedures 
  • Extensive appellate experience, including appeals of ITC cases before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
  • Experience in enforcement actions, advisory opinions, and modification proceedings
  • Unmatched experience in the presentation of public policy issues before the various federal agencies involved in the review of ITC orders

Representative Engagements

  • Vehicular Smart Watch Systems, Related Software (337-TA-3093): Defended General Motors Company and OnStar in multi-forum litigation resulting in complainant's swift voluntary withdrawal of allegations pre-institution.
  • Certain Automotive GPS Navigation Syst. (337-TA-814): Represented respondent General Motors LLC in an investigation related to automobiles with in-dash GPS navigation systems. Won dismissal of GM and termination of the investigation after six months, with no exclusion.
  • Certain Adjustable-Height Beds (337-TA-734): Represented complainant Invacare in an investigation related to adjustable hospital beds, resulting in a Consent Order excluding the accused products from entry into the U.S.
  • Baseband Processor Chips and Chipsets (337-TA-543): Represented Intervenor Sprint Nextel Corp. in the investigation brought by Broadcom against Qualcomm related to baseband processor chips used in wireless handsets before Judge Bullock. Lead counsel during the remedy phase, the Presidential Review Period, before IPR at customs, and during the enforcement action. Obtained a stay of the limited exclusion order and won the appeal to the Federal Circuit, resulting in the seminal Kyocera Wireless Corp., et al., v. Int'l Trade Comm'n decision.  

Click here for a full list of Section 337 Representative Engagements.

View More

"U.S. Patent Applicants Can Now Expedite Appeals Under New Pilot Program," IP Insights (July 6, 2020). Contacts: Deborah H. Yellin, Shannon Lentz
Client Alert/Newsletter
"Supreme Court Finds that "Generic.com" Terms Can Be Trademarks," Advertising & State AG Alert (July 6, 2020). Contacts: David Ervin, Deirdre Long Absolonne, Michelle Chipetine, Suzanne Trivette
Client Alert/Newsletter
"USPTO Announces Prioritization of Pandemic-Related Trademarks," IP Insights (June 22, 2020). Contacts: Anne Elise Herold Li, Deirdre Long Absolonne, Suzanne Trivette
Client Alert/Newsletter
Diligent and Skilled: The Changing Standard for IPR Estpoppel (June 22, 2020). Authors: Zach Ruby, Brian Paul Gearing, and Michael H. Jacobs.
Publications
Massachusetts Manufacturer Wins 'Double Pick' Patent Litigation New Hampshire Business Review (June 11, 2020)
Media Mentions
Faulty Jury Instruction Wipes Out $740 Million Verdict (June 10, 2020). Authors: Mena Gaballah, PharmD and Joshua M. Rychlinski.
Publications
In Massachusetts Case, Judge Declares Technology Patent-Ineligible Mealey's IP/Tech (June 5, 2020)
Media Mentions
"U.S. Copyright Office Weighs in on "Unbalanced" DMCA Safe Harbor System," IP Insights (June 4, 2020). Contacts: Anne Elise Herold Li, Deirdre Long Absolonne, Michelle Chipetine, Suzanne Trivette
Client Alert/Newsletter
LITIGATION NOTE: Crowell & Moring Wins Summary Judgment of Invalidity: Asserted Patent Claims an Abstract Idea Known for Thousands of Years (Jun.03.2020)
Firm News/Announcement
District Court Finds Palomar’s ‘Pick and Place’ Patent Invalid Under 101 IPWatchdog (June 3, 2020)
Media Mentions

To view more News & Events for this area, please go to our desktop site.

Crowell & Moring LLP is an international law firm with more than 500 lawyers representing clients in litigation and arbitration, regulatory, and transactional matters. The firm is internationally recognized for its representation of Fortune 500 companies in high-stakes litigation, as well as its ongoing commitment to pro bono service and diversity. The firm has offices in Washington, DC, New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Orange County, London, and Brussels.

View Desktop Site | Mobile Sitemap

Contact | Subscribe | Terms of Use | Privacy Statement | Alumni

© Crowell & Moring LLP 2020
Attorney advertising - prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.