Professionals >

High-exposure class actions asserting claims under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) are on the rise. Crowell & Moring lawyers have extensive experience advising and defending a wide range of clients on how best to navigate TCPA issues and claims involving the use of the automated telephone equipment, automatic dialing systems, artificial or prerecorded voice messages, text messages, "do not call" requests, and fax machines.

Our lawyers have successfully defended clients in many different industries—ranging from telecommunications to retailers—against class actions asserting TCPA claims in numerous jurisdictions. Outcomes in these cases have resulted in dismissals, nominal settlement of individual claims, and favorable class-wide settlements.  

We also counsel clients on compliance matters such as reviewing existing compliance frameworks, crafting policies and procedures, and training personnel on legal issues relating to the use of telephones, mobile devices, faxes, e-mails, and "do not call" requests, particularly with regard to telemarketing debt collection. In addition, we are well-versed in issues involving consumer outreach, telemarketing and collection regulations monitored by the Federal Communications Commission and Federal Trade Commission.

Representative Engagements

  • Represented a fax broadcaster that was sued along with the advertiser whose faxes it broadcast in two separate cases. In both cases, we negotiated settlements for very low amounts after demonstrating that our client was entitled to take advantage of an FCC exemption for its activities.
  • Represented the owners of a conference company sued under the TCPA in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. We removed the case to federal court on diversity grounds and defeated the plaintiffs' motion to remand, which was a precedent-setting decision. The court ultimately dismissed all of the plaintiffs' claims.
  • Represented a global telecommunications company in the Central District of California for allegedly violating the TCPA by placing outbound collect calls by means of a robotic, recorded voice to customers' cell phones. Potential damages in this case were enormous, given the number of calls at issue. We succeeded in getting the case voluntarily dismissed by the plaintiffs after demonstrating to their lawyers that they did not have standing, because the named plaintiff did not actually own the phone that received the allegedly illegal call.
  • Represented several mobile content providers in eight consumer class actions filed throughout the country alleging violation of the TCPA and various state consumer protection statutes stemming from alleged unauthorized charges to cell phone customers. Cases were filed in federal and state courts in California, Illinois, Florida, and Wisconsin, and several parallel state attorneys general investigations were also initiated.  After extensive negotiations with all segments of the industry, the cases were settled on a favorable nationwide basis.
  • Representing a telecommunications company in the defense of a class action alleging violation of the TCPA and state consumer protection statutes based on aggregation and billing services for alleged unauthorized charges to cell phone customers. Case is pending in the Northern District of California.
  • Representing a manufacturer in multiple class actions, consolidated as a multidistrict litigation in the Northern District of West Virginia, where telemarketer is alleged to have violated the "do not call" and "robo call" provisions of the TCPA "on behalf of" the manufacturer.

View More

Is Singapore's Fake News Law A Global Headache For Facebook? Legaltech News (December 5, 2019)
In the News
"European Court of Human Rights Confirms the Proportionality Test for Use of Hidden Cameras on the Work Floor," Labor & Employment Law Alert - Europe (December 3, 2019). Contacts: Frederik Van Remoortel, Emmanuel Plasschaert, Evelien Jamaels, Delphine Keppens
Client Alert/Newsletter
5 Harsh Truths About Ransomware Attacks Legaltech News (December 2, 2019)
In the News
Ninth Circuit Rejects Facebook's Article III Argument: Biometric Lawsuit Will Proceed (December, 2019). Authors: Laura Foggan, Jeffrey L. Poston, Nathanial J. Wood, and Brandon C. Ge.
Courts Are Getting Geofenced In By Location Data Quandaries Legaltech News (November 26, 2019)
In the News
"Behind the Veil: Separating Fact from Fiction in Cyber Warfare," CyberCon, Anaheim, CA (November 20, 2019). Speaker: Evan D. Wolff.
Another Sign That Companies Aren't Ready For CCPA Yet: Data Privacy Trends CloudNine (November 20, 2019)
In the News
"Data Protection Impact Assessments, The Full Picture," IAPP Europe Data Protection Congress 2019, Brussels, Belgium (November 19, 2019). Chair and Speaker: Maarten Stassen.
CCPA Uncertainty May Put Cloud Agreements Up In The Air Legaltech News (November 18, 2019)
In the News
"Immaturity of the Cybersecurity Maturity Model: Revisions Omit Higher-Level Updates," Government Contracts Bullet Points (November 13, 2019). Contacts: Evan D. Wolff, Maida Oringher Lerner, Kate M. Growley, CIPP/G, CIPP/US, Michael G. Gruden, CIPP/G
Client Alert/Newsletter

To view more News & Events for this area, please go to our desktop site.

Crowell & Moring LLP is an international law firm with more than 500 lawyers representing clients in litigation and arbitration, regulatory, and transactional matters. The firm is internationally recognized for its representation of Fortune 500 companies in high-stakes litigation, as well as its ongoing commitment to pro bono service and diversity. The firm has offices in Washington, DC, New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Orange County, London, and Brussels.

View Desktop Site | Mobile Sitemap

Contact | Subscribe | Terms of Use | Privacy Statement | Alumni

© Crowell & Moring LLP 2019
Attorney advertising - prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.