Photograph of Warrington Parker

Warrington Parker


Warrington Parker is a first chair trial lawyer and former federal prosecutor with more than 30 years of experience and has tried more than 20 cases, including civil and criminal trials on a broad range of matters – securities fraud, money laundering, employment discrimination, wrongful termination, copyright, trade secret, violation of California bond measures statutes, product liability, product defect, and breach of contract. He is a partner in the San Francisco office of Crowell & Moring and is a member of the Litigation, White Collar & Regulatory Enforcement, and Investigations groups.

As a veteran litigator who knows his way around a court room and the board room, Warrington helps clients navigate issues involving the government or claimed violations of state and federal regulations and statutes. He represents clients in False Claims Act matters, employment discrimination cases involving a federal research facility, allegations of fraud and breach of contract brought against a client by a state, and allegations that a school board inappropriately spent bond monies in violation of California law. Additionally, he conducts criminal and civil investigations, both nationally and internationally, including FCPA and financial irregularity investigations in China, Japan, and India.

American Lawyer’s Litigation Daily recognized Warrington’s litigation prowess by awarding him the “Litigator of the Week” accolade for his representation of a multinational computer technology corporation in its pay discrimination suit (2020). He has also been a member of a trial team that Law360 recognized as Legal Lions (2019) after obtaining a favorable verdict in a product liability case in California. Warrington has been named by California Super Lawyers for civil litigation and criminal defense (2006-2007, 2012-2020).

From 1992 to 1996, Warrington was an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Central District of California in the Los Angeles Criminal Division. He was a law clerk to the Honorable Cecil F. Poole of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1989-1990).

Representative Matters

  • Trial counsel in cases alleging that asbestos contamination of a company’s talc products caused mesothelioma and obtained a favorable verdict.
  • Co-counsel representing a software company at trial in case brought by OFCCP alleging pay discrimination.
  • Obtained defense verdict following trial that resulted in the setting aside of an injunction in a dispute involving the claimed inappropriate expenditure of school bond monies (Alpine Unified School District v. Grossmont Union High School District).
  • Obtained verdict favoring client in a criminal case in which the government alleged wire fraud and securities fraud (United States v. Deller).
  • Co-tried two cases and obtained defense verdict in connection with allegations of disparate impact age discrimination (Andrews et al. v. Lawrence Livermore Lab).
  • Participated in team that litigated allegations brought by Oregon against a software company alleging violations of the False Claims Act, RICO, fraud, and breach of contract (State of Oregon v. Oracle).
  • Trial counsel for an individual indicted for money laundering and wire and mail fraud (United States v. Vann).
  • With others, successfully represented a toy company in a case involving, among other things, allegations of copyright infringement and trade secret misappropriation relating to dolls (Mattel v. MGA).
  • Represent and advise a Fortune 100 company in FCPA investigations in China, Japan, and India.
  • Represented government contractor and obtained dismissal of complaint alleging False Claims Act violations.
  • Successfully represented solar energy equipment supplier in a case alleging a reverse False Claim Act claim.
  • Successfully represented a medical center in matter alleging violations of the False Claims Act.
  • Successfully represented entrepreneurs in an investigation by the U.S. Attorney’s Office concerning potential violation of the False Claims Act, specifically against potential claims of a violation of the Anti-Kickback Statute and Stark Law.
  • Conducted investigation relating to and counseled client regarding the False Claims Act retaliation provisions.
  • Represented government contractor and obtained dismissal of complaint alleging False Claims Act violations.
  • Represented officer of a company in a special investigation and follow on derivative action relating to alleged stock option backdating.
  • Represented CFO of a company alleged to have engaged in violations of securities laws.
  • Represented an ISP in a trade secrets misappropriation and breach of contract action resulting in favorable termination for client.
  • Represented a company in a trade secrets misappropriation and breach of contract action resulting in favorable termination for client.
  • Drafted appellate briefs for an events company. Without argument, the Ninth Circuit reversed the district court's decision to invalidate a settlement agreement that resolved Nevada officials' claimed infringement of client's First Amendment rights (Black Rock City, LLC v. Pershing County Board of Commissioners (Ninth Circuit)).
  • Obtained reversal of order following an election challenge that would have permanently banned the client from participating in elections (Bradley v. Perrodin (Cal. Court of Appeal)).
  • Successfully represented the client in an appeal from the denial of an arbitration request and successfully prosecuted a writ petition involving a discovery matter (Nassgil v. Hughes Electronics (Cal. Court of Appeal)).
  • Successfully represented the client in an insurance coverage matter (PMI v. AISLIC (Ninth Circuit)).
  • Successfully represented the client in an attorneys' fees dispute (Bank of America v. Williams (Cal. Court of Appeal)).
  • Obtained the reversal of a multimillion-dollar jury verdict (Tech v. National Semiconductor (Cal. Court of Appeal)).
  • Obtained reversal of conviction for securities fraud (U.S. v. Hall (Ninth Circuit)).
  • Represented law schools and professors in a First Amendment challenge to the Solomon Amendment (FAIR v. Rumsfeld (U.S. Supreme Court)).
  • Represented as amici in a matter involving a constitutional challenge to way in which students could be assigned to schools (Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle Sch. Dist. (U.S. Supreme Court)).
  • Represented amici in an appeal involving a constitutional challenge to a city policy prohibiting the use of berthing space by nonprofits that discriminated on the basis of sexual orientation (Evans v. City of Berkeley (Cal. Supreme Court)).


  • Princeton University, A.B. (1986)
  • Harvard Law School, J.D. (1989)


Admitted to practice: California; U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Second, Third, Fifth, Ninth, and Eleventh Circuits; The Supreme Court of the United States

Professional Activities and Memberships

  • Board of Directors, Legal Aid at Work (2021)
  • Board of Directors, Harvard Law School Association of Northern California (2021)
  • Member, American Bar Association
    • Co-Chair, ABA Criminal Litigation Committee (2019)
    • Co-Chair, ABA White Collar Committee's Computer Crime, Intellectual Property and Trade Secrets Subcommittee
    • Co-Chair, ABA Litigation Section Appellate Practice Committee Publications Subcommittee (2004-2008)
  • Sigma Pi Phi Fraternity
  • Lecturer, University of California, Berkeley, School of Law, Boalt Hall, Criminal Procedure (2008-2009)
  • Board Member, Mural Music & Arts Project (2017-2018)
  • Board Member, Urban High School (2010-2019)
  • Member, Ninth Circuit Criminal Appellate Panel (2008-2014)
  • Lawyer Representative, Central District of California (2002-2005)
  • Instructor, U.S. Attorney's Office, Basic Trial Advocacy (1996)
  • Staff Member, Kolts Commission (1992)
  • Board Member, Marin Country Day School (2004-2012)
  • Board Member, East Bay Community Law Center (2004-2008)

View More

Vanessa Bryant Suing LA County Over Crash Photos Bloomberg Law (August 17, 2022)
Press Coverage
"What the DOJ Annual Reports Reveal About Federal Trade Secret and IP Protection Efforts," Crowell & Moring’s Trade Secrets Trends (July 20, 2022). Authors: Jacob Canter and Warrington Parker.
"No Non-Compete? No Problem. Texas Court Grants TRO Forcing Former Employees to Stop Working for Competing Business.," Crowell & Moring’s Trade Secrets Trends (July 8, 2022). Authors: Andrew M. Spitzer and Warrington Parker.
Attorneys Weigh In On Depp-Heard Trial Associated Press (May 31, 2022)
Press Coverage
"New and Recurring Issues in False Claims Act Investigations," Responding to Government Investigations: The Latest Developments and Strategies for Government Contractors, Washington, D.C. (May 17, 2022). Speakers: Lyndsay A. Gorton, Brian Tully McLaughlin, Warrington Parker, and Michael Shaheen.
In Westlaw-ROSS Litigation, Judge Allows ROSS’s Antitrust Case To Move Forward, But Tosses ‘Sham Litigation’ Claim LawSites (April 26, 2022)
Press Coverage
"When Disruptors get Disrupted: IP Litigation in Tech Industry," Lexology (March 15, 2022). Author: Warrington Parker.
‘A Lot To Reckon With’: Crowell’s Warrington Parker Sees Shifts In Tech Suits Between Competitors And Antitrust Enforcement The AmLaw Litigation Daily (January 19, 2022)
Press Coverage
Crowell & Moring Releases Litigation Forecast 2022: What Corporate Counsel Need to Know for the Coming Year (January 12, 2022)
Firm News / Announcement
"The Intersection of Technology, Litigation, and IP –When the Disruptors Get Disrupted," Crowell & Moring's Litigation Forecast 2022 (January 12, 2022). Contributors: Warrington Parker

For all Highlights, News & Knowledge, please click here to view desktop bio.

Crowell & Moring LLP is an international law firm with offices in the United States, Europe, MENA, and Asia that represents clients in litigation and arbitration, regulatory and policy, and transactional and corporate matters. The firm is internationally recognized for its representation of Fortune 500 companies in high-stakes litigation and government-facing matters, as well as its ongoing commitment to pro bono service and diversity, equity, and inclusion.

View Desktop Site | Mobile Sitemap |

Contact | Subscribe | Terms of Use | Privacy Statement | Alumni

© Crowell & Moring LLP 2022
Attorney advertising - prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.